![]() |
|||
|
|||
More of ‘The relation of the State towards
consumption’
This extract is taken from
a speech read by Dr J. M. Mason (Chief Health Officer for the Colony of New
Zealand) that was published in the New Zealand Medical Journal 1905, Volume 4
(13), p25–29.
The State should assuredly furnish the legal machinery by
which adequate air-space, &c., is secured; it should see that no unfair
demands are made upon it by reason of the admission of indigent sufferers from
the disease from other countries; its duty it is to empower local authorities to
make suitable by-laws for the prohibition of quitting in public places; the
State alone can insist on compulsory notification.
It is a disputable matter as to how far the State as against
the municipalities should control the inspection of the foodstuffs capable of
transmitting the disease; but it is when we come to the allocation of the cost
of carrying out requirement No. 1 that the greatest diversity of opinion is to
be found.
In the Old Country many splendid sanatoria have been erected
through the generosity of benevolent citizens, and, save with respect to those
sufferers who are inmates of a poorhouse, it is never suggested that the State
should play the part of banker. Here, by reason of the fact that our ordinary
hospitals are in part supported by local rates and part by the central
authority, the common answer to an appeal for funds to establish a hospital for
such eases is, “It is the duty of the State.”
I suggest that this only expresses half the truth, and if my
contention be right it will be seen that in this country, at any rate, the State
does more than fulfil its duty. For every pound raised by rate the central
authority is by law bound to subsidise it to the extent of one more pound; and
for every twenty shillings subscribed by private persons, another twenty-four
can be obtained from the Consolidated Fund. In addition to this, the Government
has established a splendid sanatorium on the hills near Cambridge for sufferers
throughout the colony.
There are a large number of both curable and incurable cases
among the absolutely penniless, and I submit that the time has come when appeals
such as those made by Dr. Valintine, Nurse Maud, and Nurse Holgate should
receive the same satisfactory answer as has been given in Taranaki,
Christchurch, Nelson, and Wellington.
One other way in which great help could be given would be to
enlist the sympathies of every one by means of the setting-up of a society for
the prevention of consumption somewhat on the lines of the association of which
our Sovereign King Edward is the patron.
His Excellency Lord Plunket, in ‘the course of a
speech at the Cambridge Sanatorium, expressed his willingness to help such a
society in any way that seemed best. I ask you, as representing the medical
profession of New Zealand, to affirm the desirability of establishing such a
society. Under its auspices medical men should deliver lectures, and endeavour
to interest the public in this great life-saving propaganda.
Members might become a sort of preventive police, reminding
persons who were careless in spitting on pavements and in public places that
such practices were not only illegal, but dangerous. With such united action it
would not be a difficult matter to stop or lessen the yearly sacrifice to this
modern juggernaut..
NZMJ
Note: For additional text from this
speech, see http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/117-1200/1025/
which was published in the 20 August 2004 issue of the NZMJ. And for some more
news from the Cambridge Sanatorium 100 years ago and some background, see
http://cambridgemuseum.org.nz/Npapers/Inde100s/1904.htm#Dec04
and http://www.cambridgemuseum.org.nz/Articles/tewaisanart.htm
|
|||
| Current
issue | Search journal |
Archived issues | Classifieds
| Hotline (free ads) Subscribe | Contribute | Advertise | Contact Us | Copyright | Other Journals |